000079762 001__ 79762
000079762 005__ 20201118144703.0
000079762 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1371/journal.pone.0218117
000079762 0248_ $$2sideral$$a112662
000079762 037__ $$aART-2019-112662
000079762 041__ $$aeng
000079762 100__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-7293-318X$$aOsma, J.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000079762 245__ $$aWhat format of treatment do patients with emotional disorders prefer and why? Implications for public mental health settings and policies
000079762 260__ $$c2019
000079762 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000079762 5203_ $$aObjective We analyzed the preference of three psychological intervention formats-individual, group, and online-in a sample of 267 patients with a primary diagnosis of emotional disorder in Spanish public mental health settings. Method We studied patients'' preferences considering sociodemographic characteristics, diagnoses, history of psychological treatments, number of sessions, and satisfaction with past interventions. Results Most participants (85.4%) preferred psychological treatment in an individual format, 14.2% in group, and 0.4% online. When comparing the people who chose individual and group treatment, no demographic or clinical differences were found. The arguments against group format were the lack of privacy and expression difficulties. Regarding online format, these included being considered impersonal and ineffective. Conclusion The rejection of group and online psychotherapy formats allows us to define the actions we should carry out in public mental health settings to improve the acceptance of more cost-effective therapy formats.
000079762 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/DGA/S31-17D$$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII-FIS/PI17-00320
000079762 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000079762 590__ $$a2.74$$b2019
000079762 591__ $$aMULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES$$b27 / 71 = 0.38$$c2019$$dQ2$$eT2
000079762 592__ $$a1.023$$b2019
000079762 593__ $$aMultidisciplinary$$c2019$$dQ1
000079762 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000079762 700__ $$aSuso-Ribera, C.
000079762 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-2437-1207$$aPeris-Baquero, O.
000079762 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0001-8261-058X$$aGil-Lacruz, M.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000079762 700__ $$aPerez-Ayerra, L.
000079762 700__ $$aFerreres-Galan, V.
000079762 700__ $$aTorres-Alfosea, M.A.
000079762 700__ $$aLopez-Escriche, M.
000079762 700__ $$aDominguez, O.
000079762 7102_ $$14009$$2740$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Psicología Social
000079762 7102_ $$14009$$2680$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDpto. Psicología y Sociología$$cÁrea Person.Eval.Trat.Psicoló.
000079762 773__ $$g14, 6 (2019), 0218117 [14 pp]$$pPLoS One$$tPloS one$$x1932-6203
000079762 8564_ $$s528688$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/79762/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000079762 8564_ $$s91152$$uhttps://zaguan.unizar.es/record/79762/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000079762 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:79762$$particulos$$pdriver
000079762 951__ $$a2020-11-18-14:42:43
000079762 980__ $$aARTICLE