Repositorio Institucional de Documentos

Resumen: This work studies the valorisation of biodiesel-derived glycerol to produce a hydrogen rich gas by means of a two-step sequential process. Firstly, the crude glycerol was purified with acetic acid to reduce problematical impurities. The effect of the final pH (5-7) on the neutralisation process was addressed and it was found that a pH of 6 provided the best phase separation and the greatest glycerol purity. Secondly, the refined glycerol was upgraded by catalytic steam reforming and this step was theoretically and experimentally studied. The theoretical study analyses the effect of the temperature (400-700°C), glycerol concentration (10-50 wt.%) and N2 (225-1347 cm3 STP/min) and liquid flow (0.5-1 mL/min) rates on the thermodynamic composition of the gas. The results show that the temperature and glycerol concentration exerted the greatest influence on the thermodynamics. The experimental study considers the effect of the temperature (400-700°C), glycerol concentration (10-50 wt.%) and spatial time (3-17 g catalyst min/g glycerol) on the product distribution in carbon basis (gas, liquid and solid) and on the composition of the gas and liquid phases. The experiments were planned according to a 2 level 3 factor Box-Wilson Central Composite Face Centred (CCF, a: ± 1) design, which is suitable for studying the influence of each variable as well as all the possible interactions between variables. The results were analysed with an analysis of variance (ANOVA) with 95% confidence, enabling the optimisation of the process. The gas phase was made up of a mixture of H2 (65-95 vol.%), CO2 (2-29 vol.%), CO (0-18 vol.%) and CH4 (0-5 vol.%). Temperatures of 550°C and above enabled thermodynamic compositions for the gas to be achieved and helped diminish carbon formation. A possible optimum for H2 production was found at a temperature of around 680°C, feeding a glycerol solution of 37 wt.% and using a spatial time of 3 g catalyst min/g glycerol. These conditions provide a 95% carbon conversion to gas, having the following composition: 67 vol.% H2, 22 vol.% CO2, 11 vol.% CO and 1 vol.% CH4.
Idioma: Inglés
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.01.035
Año: 2016
Publicado en: Fuel Processing Technology 145 (2016), 130-147
ISSN: 0378-3820
Factor impacto JCR: 3.752 (2016)
Categ. JCR: CHEMISTRY, APPLIED rank: 8 / 72 = 0.111 (2016) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL rank: 17 / 135 = 0.126 (2016) - Q1 - T1
Categ. JCR: ENERGY & FUELS rank: 23 / 92 = 0.25 (2016) - Q1 - T1
Factor impacto SCIMAGO: 1.397 - Chemical Engineering (miscellaneous) (Q1) - Fuel Technology (Q1) - Energy Engineering and Power Technology (Q1)

Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/BES-2011-044856
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/ENE2010-18985
Financiación: info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/MINECO/ENE2013-41523-R
Tipo y forma: Artículo (PostPrint)
Área (Departamento): Área Ingeniería Química (Dpto. Ing.Quím.Tecnol.Med.Amb.)

Debe reconocer adecuadamente la autoría, proporcionar un enlace a la licencia e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo de cualquier manera razonable, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene el apoyo del licenciador o lo recibe por el uso que hace. No puede utilizar el material para una finalidad comercial. Si remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no puede difundir el material modificado.

Exportado de SIDERAL (2020-02-21-13:50:22)


Visitas y descargas

Este artículo se encuentra en las siguientes colecciones:
Artículos