000061486 001__ 61486
000061486 005__ 20170612112602.0
000061486 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1155/2014/275654
000061486 0248_ $$2sideral$$a98797
000061486 037__ $$aART-2014-98797
000061486 041__ $$aeng
000061486 100__ $$aCalvo, P.
000061486 245__ $$aAssessment of the optic disc morphology using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and scanning laser ophthalmoscopy
000061486 260__ $$c2014
000061486 5060_ $$aAccess copy available to the general public$$fUnrestricted
000061486 5203_ $$aObjective. To compare the equivalent optic nerve head (OHN) parameters obtained with confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (HRT3) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) in healthy and glaucoma patients. Methods. One hundred and eighty-two consecutive healthy subjects and 156 patients with open-angle glaucoma were divided into 2 groups according to intraocular pressure and visual field outcomes. All participants underwent imaging of the ONH with the HRT3 and the Cirrus OCT. The ONH parameters and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were compared between both groups. Results. Mean age did not differ between the normal and glaucoma groups (59.55 ± 9.7 years and 61.05 ± 9.4 years, resp.; P = 0.15). Rim area, average cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio, vertical C/D ratio, and cup volume were different between both instruments (P < 0.001). All equivalent ONH parameters, except disc area, were different between both groups (P < 0.001). The best areas under the ROC curve were observed for vertical C/D ratio (0.980 for OCT and 0.942 for HRT3; P = 0.11). Sensitivities at 95% fixed-specificities of OCT parameters were higher than those of HRT3. Conclusions. Equivalent ONH parameters of Cirrus OCT and HRT3 are different and cannot be used interchangeably. ONH parameters measured with OCT yielded a slightly better diagnostic performance.
000061486 536__ $$9info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ES/ISCIII/FIS/PI11-01239
000061486 540__ $$9info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess$$aby$$uhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
000061486 590__ $$a1.579$$b2014
000061486 591__ $$aMEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL$$b85 / 123 = 0.691$$c2014$$dQ3$$eT3
000061486 591__ $$aBIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY$$b107 / 163 = 0.656$$c2014$$dQ3$$eT2
000061486 655_4 $$ainfo:eu-repo/semantics/article$$vinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
000061486 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0002-2914-2593$$aFerreras, A.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000061486 700__ $$aAbadia, B.
000061486 700__ $$aAra, M.
000061486 700__ $$aFigus, M.
000061486 700__ $$0(orcid)0000-0003-2389-8282$$aPablo, L. E.$$uUniversidad de Zaragoza
000061486 700__ $$aFrezzotti, P.
000061486 7102_ $$11004$$2646$$aUniversidad de Zaragoza$$bDepartamento de Cirugía, Ginecología y Obstetricia$$cOftalmología
000061486 773__ $$g2014 (2014), 275654 [6 pp]$$pBioMed res. int.$$tBioMed Research International$$x2314-6133
000061486 8564_ $$s1264248$$uhttp://zaguan.unizar.es/record/61486/files/texto_completo.pdf$$yVersión publicada
000061486 8564_ $$s99587$$uhttp://zaguan.unizar.es/record/61486/files/texto_completo.jpg?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yVersión publicada
000061486 909CO $$ooai:zaguan.unizar.es:61486$$particulos$$pdriver
000061486 951__ $$a2017-06-12-09:39:55
000061486 980__ $$aARTICLE